小米黑鲨5智能手机评测--以实惠的价格享受游戏乐趣这就是它没有顶级SoC的赌博方式。 作为一个便宜的游戏机型，小米黑鲨5配备了一个快速但不是顶级的处理器。然而，专业机型的144赫兹屏幕依然存在。黑鲨5太慢了，还是对游戏玩家来说仍然是个便宜货？Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/12/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇸🇪 🇭🇺 5G Android ARM Gaming Smartphone
Test device courtesy of Black Shark
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 (Black Shark Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G 8 x 2.4 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 650Memory12 GB Display6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 720Hz sampling rate, MEMC, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 HzStorage256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB , 238 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/20/26/28/32/34/38/39/40/41/42/43/66), 5G (n1/3/5/7/8/28/38/41/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 9.9 x 163.8 x 76.4Battery4650 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 120 Watt chargingChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 12CameraPrimary Camera: 64 MPix f/1.79, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/60fps (Camera 1); 13 MP, f/2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 5 MP, f/2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Videos @1080p/60fps Additional featuresSpeakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, bumper, 24 Months Warranty, multicoloured notification LED (rear), mechanical shoulder buttons, fanlessWeight220 g
Price649 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
潜在的竞争对手比较
RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionPrice
84.9 %v7 (old)08 / 2022Xiaomi Black Shark 5SD 870, Adreno 650220 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.7 %v7 (old)06 / 2022Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProSD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730220 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
86.3 %v7 (old)08 / 2021Xiaomi Black Shark 4SD 870, Adreno 650210 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
83.6 %v7 (old)10 / 2021Nubia RedMagic 6S ProSD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660220 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2400x1080
85.3 %v7 (old)02 / 2022Motorola Moto G200 5GSD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660202 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2460x1080
外壳和功能 - 后方通知LED黑鲨5的价格是高端手机的价格，但它仍然提供高端机型的许多功能黑鲨5 Pro与它。该机型可提供以下数量的内存。
黑鲨5 - 8GB内存/128GB大容量存储。549欧元黑鲨5 - 12GB内存/256GB大容量存储。649欧元我们将测试较大的内存变体，看看是否值得购买。由于与黑鲨5 Pro相比，节省了250欧元 黑鲨5 Pro(可在amazon.de899欧元）相比，它甚至可能是游戏玩家更明智的选择。
黑鲨5有灰色和黑色两种颜色，看起来比Pro型号更内敛：背面折射光线，有一个大的品牌字样，还有，像在 小米黑鲨5 Pro，背面有一个多色的LED，显示通知。然而，这款智能手机的设计对于商务会议来说可能有点过于浮夸。
质量一般：虽然有金属框架和玻璃背面，但外壳会被压得有些发响。然而，这款手机的手感很好，并且有一个干净的表面。
你没有得到IP认证，没有无线充电，即使在廉价机型中也只有一个USB 2.0端口。不过，NFC和蓝牙5.2都在船上。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro Motorola Moto G200 5G Xiaomi Black Shark 4 Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro DIN A6 ❌
通信、软件和操作 - 游戏和日常生活中的触发器肩部按钮可以被分配许多功能。这款手机支持Wi-Fi 6，但不支持Wi-Fi 6E，所以它不能访问不太常用的6GHz频段。在我们用AXE11000路由器进行的测试中，这对速度有轻微的负面影响：手机达到了典型的速度，但与AXE11000相比，在接收数据时，速度略低且不稳定。 黑鲨5 Pro支持WiFi 6E。
支持5G，就像许多4G频率一样，所以你也可以毫无问题地在国外进行移动冲浪。在测试过程中，我们的样品的接收效果很好，甚至在室内也是如此。
内部的JoyUI是基于Android 12，并配备了特殊的设计和一些针对游戏玩家的额外功能：例如，你可以为鲨鱼空间的游戏调整许多设置。在我们的测试中，我们得到了从2022年6月开始的已经有些旧的安全补丁的更新。你应该期待每三个月一次的安全更新，制造商称2年为更新期。
黑鲨手机的商标之一是机械触发器，可以通过滑块延长和缩回。它们不仅可以用于游戏，也有利于智能手机的日常使用，例如，滚动或启动应用程序。这些控制可以自由分配，但它们总是具有例如相机应用程序中的快门释放功能。
待机按钮位于外壳的右侧，指纹传感器也集成在这里。它几乎毫无延迟地解锁了智能手机，而且工作可靠。通过脸部扫描解锁也是可能的，但它只是基于软件，因此不那么安全。
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12Nubia RedMagic 6S ProWi-Fi 6E
1129 (1030min - 1155max) MBit/s Motorola Moto G200 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
864 (759min - 906max) MBit/s Xiaomi Black Shark 4802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
656 (613min - 676max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AX12Nubia RedMagic 6S ProWi-Fi 6E
953 (717min - 1469max) MBit/s Motorola Moto G200 5G802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
836 (809min - 863max) MBit/s Xiaomi Black Shark 4802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
811 (771min - 835max) MBit/s iperf3 transmit AXE11000Xiaomi Black Shark 5802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
931 (880min - 949max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AXE11000Xiaomi Black Shark 5802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
752 (676min - 828max) MBit/s iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzXiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
853 (785min - 906max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzXiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
943 (893min - 950max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Black Shark 5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø751 (676-828) Xiaomi Black Shark 5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø931 (880-949)
照相机 - 没有混合变焦来自前置摄像头的照片具有6400万像素的主摄像头来自三星，通常以四分之一的分辨率拍照，但具有更多的感光性、更大的像素。在图片亮度差异较大的情况下，黑暗区域的色彩再现受到影响。此外，图像总体上严重模糊。近距离观察时，大面积区域看起来有颗粒感。在光线不足的情况下，相机的亮度很高，仍能显示一些细节。
广角相机只能直接选择，没有混合变焦。我们喜欢失真校正，但画面整体上有明显的蓝色偏移，放大后几乎没有显示更多细节。还有一个低分辨率的微距相机，用于极端特写。
用该摄像系统拍摄的视频最高可以达到4K，60帧。如果你想用广角镜头拍摄，你必须在拍摄前选择它，因为不支持在拍摄时切换。自动对焦反应迅速，没有抽风，曝光调整也很好。
制造商声称前置摄像头是2000万像素，但实际上它只是一个来自Omnivision的1600万像素传感器。用它拍出像样的自拍是可能的，但它们在黑暗区域可以显示更多的细节，而且在细节上看起来也有点颗粒感。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkameraclick to load imagesXiaomi Black Shark 5Apple iPhone 13Honor Magic4 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Black Shark 5Apple iPhone 13Honor Magic4 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Black Shark 5Apple iPhone 13Honor Magic4 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Black Shark 5Apple iPhone 13Honor Magic4 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
21.8 ∆E11.4 ∆E16.9 ∆E23.1 ∆E13.4 ∆E9.4 ∆E12.7 ∆E16.3 ∆E14 ∆E10.3 ∆E9.3 ∆E9 ∆E11 ∆E15.8 ∆E15.9 ∆E4.3 ∆E12 ∆E17 ∆E5.6 ∆E3.7 ∆E9.4 ∆E14.5 ∆E12.1 ∆E1.2 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 5: 12.08 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 23.05 ∆E28.6 ∆E43 ∆E37.3 ∆E34.3 ∆E43.8 ∆E60.7 ∆E38.1 ∆E31.7 ∆E31 ∆E28.6 ∆E59.6 ∆E59.6 ∆E29.9 ∆E43.2 ∆E28.3 ∆E57.1 ∆E38.9 ∆E41.4 ∆E46.5 ∆E50.6 ∆E44.6 ∆E35.4 ∆E23.3 ∆E13.3 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 5: 39.54 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 60.68 ∆E
Xiaomi Black Shark 5Xiaomi Black Shark 5
显示器 - PWM闪烁可能是一个问题子像素结构屏幕是一块AMOLED面板，分辨率为2400 x 1080像素。亮点是高达144Hz的高帧率。屏幕被证明是足够明亮的，但它几乎没有达到高于700cd/m²的数值，即使在一个小的测量区域。这对于户外使用来说是可以的，但是为了获得更好的HDR体验，亮度可以更高。
黑鲨5的显示结果与黑鲨5 Pro的显示结果非常相似。 黑鲨5专业版所以它似乎是相同的面板。
只有在响应时间上有差异，但这将是由于我们的新示波器，它记录了更准确的数值。PWM频率也更高，这似乎是由于不同的控制。没有直流调光模式来缓解PWM的闪烁。
652cd/m²654cd/m²644cd/m²643cd/m²649cd/m²638cd/m²649cd/m²647cd/m²641cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 654 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 646.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.96 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 98 %Center on Battery: 649 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.88 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.215CCT: 7171 K
Xiaomi Black Shark 5AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProAMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"Xiaomi Black Shark 4Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"Nubia RedMagic 6S ProAMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8"Motorola Moto G200 5GIPS LCD, 2460x1080, 6.8"Response Times-317%-393%-42%-1664% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *1.8 ?(0.8, 1)6 ?(3, 3) -233%11 ?(5, 6) -511%2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2) -33%32 ?(15, 17) -1678% Response Time Black / White *1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8)8 ?(5, 3) -400%6 ?(3, 3) -275%2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2) -50%28 ?(17, 11) -1650% PWM Frequency460235162.390.6 ?(100)89290Screen-6%-14%-27%-6%Brightness middle649642 -1%676 4%714 10%512 -21%Brightness646637 -1%669 4%705 9%488 -24%Brightness Distribution9896 -2%98 0%96 -2%87 -11%Black Level *0.36Colorchecker dE 2000 *3.883.19 18%5.77 -49%5.9 -52%3.42 12%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *7.587.12 6%9.81 -29%8.7 -15%5.9 22%Greyscale dE 2000 *3.24.9 -53%3.7 -16%6.8 -113%3.7 -16%Gamma2.215 99%2.22 99%1.959 112%2.25 98%7154 0%CCT7171 91%7671 85%6584 99%7774 84%1.944 334362%Contrast1422Total Average (Program / Settings)-162% /
-83%-204% /
-109%-35% /
-31%-835% /
-421%* ... smaller is better
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise↘ 0.8 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise↘ 1 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 460 HzThe display backlight flickers at 460 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 460 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8320 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
0% 亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度性能、排放和电池寿命--持久的乐趣该 骁龙870已经被用在 黑鲨4.它是一个上等的SoC，但在性能方面仍然比目前的顶级处理器低一个级别，而且这个SoC也有点老。在我们的基准测试中，该处理器的性能比其他游戏手机略低，差异有时约为20%。
在图形密集型应用中， Adreno 650实际上保持得很好，但3DMark Wild Life显示，图形解决方案并不像其他游戏手机那样适合未来。
黑鲨5在我们的游戏基准测试中可以达到相当好的速率，尽管在快速射击游戏Armajet中它们波动很大。作为回报，你可以在PUBG Mobile中使用90帧的低设置，这在黑鲨5 Pro上是没有的。 黑鲨5 Pro在测试时无法使用。
存储控制器就没有那么有说服力了。与专业机型相比，黑鲨5不得不接受传输速度的下降。这些差异是如此明显，以至于在日常使用中也可以看到，应用程序的加载时间稍长。
作为回报，黑鲨5必须处理比其更强大的兄弟少得多的热量。在长期高负荷的情况下，机箱会明显发热，但废热仍在合理范围内，只有在高环境温度下才会变得令人不快。
立体声扬声器位于手机的短边上，传播的声音很好，中音很深，总体来说声音很圆润。如果你想要更好的声音，你可以通过USB-C或蓝牙连接耳机或扬声器，而后者可以使用目前所有的aptX编解码器。
黑鲨5配备了4650毫安时的电池，在我们的Wi-Fi测试中提供了13小时的体面运行时间，在游戏中也能持续几个小时。这款手机可以通过附带的适配器以高达120瓦的功率进行充电。因此，电池最多需要半小时，直到它再次完全充满。
Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)Xiaomi Black Shark 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
980 Points Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1236 Points +26%Xiaomi Black Shark 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1002 Points +2%Nubia RedMagic 6S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1170 Points +19%Motorola Moto G200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1076 Points +10%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (943 - 1046, n=16)
989 Points +1%Average of class Smartphone (145 - 2437, n=148, last 2 years)
1147 Points +17% Multi-Core (sort by value)Xiaomi Black Shark 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
3133 Points Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3742 Points +19%Xiaomi Black Shark 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3394 Points +8%Nubia RedMagic 6S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3644 Points +16%Motorola Moto G200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3286 Points +5%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (2725 - 4455, n=16)
3245 Points +4%Average of class Smartphone (550 - 8816, n=148, last 2 years)
3893 Points +24%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
16001 Points Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12578 Points -21%Xiaomi Black Shark 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
16054 Points 0%Nubia RedMagic 6S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13127 Points -18%Motorola Moto G200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
18567 Points +16%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (9827 - 16054, n=15)
12937 Points -19%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)
14335 Points -10%3DMark
Wild Life Score (sort by value)Xiaomi Black Shark 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
4374 Points Xiaomi Black Shark 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4351 Points -1%Nubia RedMagic 6S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5895 Points +35%Motorola Moto G200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5765 Points +32%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (4166 - 4374, n=16)
4264 Points -3%Average of class Smartphone (270 - 13896, n=101, last 2 years)
2994 Points -32% Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)Xiaomi Black Shark 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
4317 Points Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10238 Points +137%Xiaomi Black Shark 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4352 Points +1%Nubia RedMagic 6S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5875 Points +36%Motorola Moto G200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5711 Points +32%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (4152 - 4352, n=16)
4247 Points -2%Average of class Smartphone (271 - 28053, n=189, last 2 years)
9814 Points +127% Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)Xiaomi Black Shark 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1254 Points Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2606 Points +108%Xiaomi Black Shark 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1234 Points -2%Nubia RedMagic 6S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1543 Points +23%Motorola Moto G200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1564 Points +25%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1203 - 1254, n=15)
1232 Points -2%Average of class Smartphone (61 - 7094, n=192, last 2 years)
2620 Points +109% Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)Xiaomi Black Shark 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1241 Points Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2534 Points +104%Xiaomi Black Shark 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1246 Points 0%Nubia RedMagic 6S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1509 Points +22%Motorola Moto G200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1453 Points +17%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (1195 - 1246, n=15)
1226 Points -1%Average of class Smartphone (62 - 7212, n=191, last 2 years)
2610 Points +110%GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Black Shark 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
43 fps -17%Xiaomi Black Shark 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
53 fps +2%Nubia RedMagic 6S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
51 fps -2%Motorola Moto G200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
42 fps -19%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (22 - 54, n=16)
45.2 fps -13%Average of class Smartphone (5.5 - 166, n=202, last 2 years)
56.5 fps +9%1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Black Shark 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
61 fps Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps -2%Xiaomi Black Shark 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
61 fps 0%Nubia RedMagic 6S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
61 fps 0%Motorola Moto G200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
39 fps -36%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (50 - 62, n=16)
58.2 fps -5%Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 332, n=202, last 2 years)
105.4 fps +73%on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Black Shark 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
34 fps Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
58 fps +71%Xiaomi Black Shark 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
34 fps 0%Nubia RedMagic 6S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
31 fps -9%Motorola Moto G200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
33 fps -3%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (17 - 34, n=16)
28.8 fps -15%Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=203, last 2 years)
44.6 fps +31%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)Xiaomi Black Shark 5Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
22 fps Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19 fps -14%Xiaomi Black Shark 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
23 fps +5%Nubia RedMagic 6S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
22 fps 0%Motorola Moto G200 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
19 fps -14%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (18 - 23, n=16)
21.8 fps -1%Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 129, n=202, last 2 years)
41.4 fps +88%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5Xiaomi Black Shark 5 ProXiaomi Black Shark 4Nubia RedMagic 6S ProMotorola Moto G200 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-583%23%22%19%47%80% Sequential Read 256KB1363.71945.4 43%1663 22%1607 18%1898 39%1732 ?(950 - 2037, n=108) 27%2168 ?(270 - 4384, n=188, last 2 years) 59% Sequential Write 256KB677.41485.2 119%760 12%765 13%712 5%1163 ?(166.8 - 2004, n=108) 72%1761 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=188, last 2 years) 160% Random Read 4KB224.3344.9 54%283.1 26%285.8 27%155.9 -30%286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=108) 28%294 ?(47.6 - 504, n=188, last 2 years) 31% Random Write 4KB197.5424.8 115%259.9 32%254.9 29%322.5 63%315 ?(62.6 - 499, n=109) 59%337 ?(9.4 - 964, n=188, last 2 years) 71%
Gaming Benchmarks
PUBG Mobile
HDNubia RedMagic 6S Pro
60 (59min - 61max) fps 0%Motorola Moto G200 5G
60 fps 0%Xiaomi Black Shark 5
60 (57min - 61max) fps Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
59.8 (57min, 58P1 - 61max) fps 0% SmoothNubia RedMagic 6S Pro
91 (87min - 91max) fps +1%Xiaomi Black Shark 5
90 (75min - 90max) fps Motorola Moto G200 5G
60 fps -33%Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
59.8 (57min, 57.59P1 - 61max) fps -34%Armajet - Deathmatch, 4vs4, Magma, Bots only
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
56.9 (46min, 47.3P1 - 61max) fps +9%Motorola Moto G200 5G
56 fps +8%Xiaomi Black Shark 5
52 (38min - 69max) fps Legend
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 660, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀温度
Max. LoadIdle
40.9 °C41.7 °C36.4 °C 42.6 °C41.8 °C37.4 °C 42.7 °C41.9 °C36.6 °C
Maximum: 42.7 °CAverage: 40.2 °C
35.6 °C39.5 °C39.7 °C36.4 °C40 °C41.3 °C36.9 °C41.2 °C43.9 °C
Maximum: 43.9 °CAverage: 39.4 °C Power Supply (max.) 42.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
30.8 °C30.9 °C30.9 °C 30.9 °C30.9 °C31.4 °C 31.1 °C31 °C31 °C
Maximum: 31.4 °CAverage: 31 °C
29.9 °C30.7 °C31 °C30.6 °C31 °C31.2 °C30.3 °C31 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 31.6 °CAverage: 30.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 41.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
热力图前线
热图 背面演讲者
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Xiaomi Black Shark 5 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69% lower than median(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 1% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G200 5G audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 63% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Smartphone (575 - 3244, n=201, last 2 years)
1081 min +38%Motorola Moto G200 5G5000 mAh
905 min +16%Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro5050 mAh
829 min +6%Xiaomi Black Shark 54650 mAh
781 min Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro4650 mAh
752 min -4%Xiaomi Black Shark 44500 mAh
710 min -9%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
13h 01min
Pros+ 良好的游戏软件
+ 快速的指纹识别传感器
+ 明亮的屏幕
+ 良好的电池运行时间和充电时间
+ 可以进行90赫兹的游戏
+ 机械触发器Cons- PWM闪烁
- 更新承诺短
- 没有IP认证
评语--对游戏者来说通常是足够的在审查中。小米黑鲨5。测试设备由黑鲨提供。小米黑鲨5的视角很重要：如果你想要一个绝对面向未来的游戏手机，可以在当前的顶级游戏中使用多年，那么建议使用具有更快的SoC的智能手机。如果要求不是很高和/或你想在未来几年内无论如何都要更换手机，那么它仍然完全可以满足当前的手机游戏。
此外，还有很棒的游戏软件和机械触发器，在日常使用中也能巧妙地融入手机的整体操作理念。电池的持续时间甚至比在 黑鲨5 Pro但你必须没有现代的WiFi 6E。这款手机的屏幕与更昂贵的兄弟相差无几，但在相机方面有轻微的缺点。
黑鲨5是一款带有机械触发器的低价位游戏手机。它不能在顶级性能联盟中发挥，但可以满足更高的要求。
如果你投资250欧元的附加费用购买专业型，你将得到更多的性能，更不寻常的外观，以及稍好的配置。
这款手机 小米黑鲨4也仍然有售，例如在amazon.de.在这里你可以省下几欧元，而且由于相同的SoC和更加克制的设计，它可能是一个很好的选择。然而，你应该考虑软件更新周期较短的问题。
价格和可用性小米黑鲨5的制造商价格为549欧元，为较小的存储版本。你可以直接从制造商的网站上订购它或从amazon.de.
带有256GB大容量存储和12GB内存的存储版本要多花100欧元，它也可以在制造商的网站https://eu.blackshark.com/products/blackshark5或在amazon.de.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5
- 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Chassis83%
Keyboard69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device96%
Connectivity48 / 70 → 69%
Weight88%
Battery90%
Display88%
Games Performance55 / 64 → 86%
Application Performance80 / 86 → 93%
Temperature86%
Noise100%
Audio75 / 90 → 83%
Camera69%
Average79%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceXiaomi Black Shark 5 (Black Shark Series)Review•小米黑鲨5 Pro智能手机评测--最适合游戏的手机？ |Review•小米黑鲨4智能手机评测--144赫兹显示屏的移动游戏
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 584056 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!